Amenity, in eye of beholder

Catherine Carter | Thursday, 14 April 2011 8:00 AM | Add Comment

The ABS population forecast released earlier this month have stimulated discussion, especially on increasing density in the ACT’s existing built areas.

One surprising view I’ve heard is the belief that greater density will inevitably hurt the community by reducing amenity.

I’m surprised because I recently moved with my family, including young children and small dog, from the traditional Australian dream home – in the suburbs on a quarter-acre block – to an apartment in a more central location. And the move has made our home life much more enjoyable, partly because of the greater density and closer proximity to amenities.

I can now walk to shops and restaurants, the children’s school, and beautiful, established parks. Already we’re riding our bikes more – for pleasure, as well as transport. The dog is pleased too because my travel times are shorter I have more time for walks.

The park is in my line of vision from the apartment so my children can play under my watchful (but not too intrusive) gaze. The difference to them? They now have to go through two doors instead of one, before they reach a green play area.

And I can enjoy the gardens around me without having to weed or mow then (though I do have plans for greenery on our terrace).

Moving to an apartment wouldn’t suit everyone. But I like the style, and I’m already finding myself part of a new community in my new neighbourhood.

When I hear people’s fears that increased density will cost amenity, I can only assume they mean that it will reduce open space. But city life, especially in Canberra, where many of our corridors and open spaces are protected, suits me fine.

Amenity, real amenity, involves a choice of how you want to live. And there are plenty of people in Canberra who, like me, enjoy the reduced travel time, the convenience and liveliness of urban living.

Catherine Carter is ACT Executive Director of the Property Council of Australia

Catherine Carter | Thursday, 14 April 2011 8:00 AM | Add Comment

Post Comment
* = Required Information

Subscribe