Adelaide 2036: Have your say!

Nathan Paine | Tuesday, 27 October 2009 12:01 AM | 5 Comments

The Property Council of Australia (South Australian Division) has made an audacious call for a revitalised and rejuvenated central business district in Adelaide, having released its visionary report "Adelaide 2036: Building on Light's Vision".

Adelaide 2036 is a goad to action in a city accustomed to much talk and little action, raising a challenge for change to Adelaide’s parochial and conservative history. 

 



Video blog: Nathan Paine, Executive Director - Property Council of Australia 
 



The same challenge has been taken to the state's political leaders; the report has been put to them with a request that, in the lead up to the 2010 election, they state how they will use the ideas within Adelaide 2036 to create the city all South Australians want.

In so doing we are forcing our political leaders to either take action or take responsibility for the lack of it.

In designing Adelaide, Colonel Light gave us one of the best urban fabrics on which to work – a framework of streets, squares and parks that has remained virtually unchanged through 150 years of global growth and change.

This framework remains invaluable, but we need to stop thinking about Adelaide in the 1800s and 1900s and instead focus on what our great city should be at our bicentenary in 2036.

As our emerging industries begin to draw global attention to our great economic potential and the unparalleled lifestyle opportunities Adelaide boasts, the central city will soon feel the impact of new demands and expectations and it must be prepared to evolve and adapt.

This process of adaptation does not mean casting aside the things that make Adelaide great; on the contrary we need to unleash the potential in our existing advantages. Our Park Lands must be viewed as active spaces for people that draw rather than repel the community; heritage in our built environment must provide mojo and verve to our city, but must not mean preserving our city in aspic.

We need to stop talking about ways of building on our potential and begin to deliver on these ideas. Our Park Lands, Victoria Square, the river front, our laneways have been political footballs for too long; it’s time for us to agree that good urban design can be a catalyst for community and economic development.

In Adelaide 2036, the Property Council sets out a vision and agenda that is squarely focused on redesigning how we manage and use our city.

We invite comment from all those with a stake in our city’s future – be it economic, social or environmental.

The document looks to the future and is grounded in the past. Just as Light showed vision in laying out a versatile, accessible and robust town plan, we need to show vision in ensuring that the plan is clothed with a city that meets the needs of all South Australians.


How do you want Adelaide to look in the year 2036?

Have your say below.


 

Nathan Paine | Tuesday, 27 October 2009 12:01 AM | 5 Comments

Comments on this post

  • Chris said...

    Overall I think this is an excellent document - full compliments to the authors. I do question, however, the emphasis on car parking, particular underground car parking. Building underground car parks would be highly disruptive to city life, requiring extensive earth works and removal. Trucks would be hauling dirt in and out of the city for many months. Furthermore, page 19 recommends both reducing city car dominance and building new car parks beneath city squares - two ideas which seem entirely at odds with one another. Are the authors advocating making it easier for personal vehicle trips to end within the confines of the city centre or harder?

    Posted Tuesday, 27 October 2009 6:31 AM

  • Amiee said...

    I hope in the year 2036 we wont be sitting on Grenfell Street on a Saturday afternoon with fourty other people waiting for a bus to Paradise interchange (for over 20 minutes). Get the transport system right. Cars and buses are going to keep going into the CBD and the numbers are going to rise. Bus lanes? The o-bahn is useless. Tie it in with the train and greyhound bus system. Build a city interchange on north terrace for trams/trains/buses instead of a hospital. Upgrade the RAH, it's good where it is.

    Posted Tuesday, 27 October 2009 4:59 PM

  • kelsale said...

    I see this report as not protecting the parklands. NO BUILDING ON PARKLANDS, THESE GREEN AREAS SHOULD BE KEPT, ALSO BEAUTIFICATION ALONG RIVER BANKS FOR RECREATION & WALKS, BUILDINGS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED ON PARKLANDS OR RIVER FRONTAGE. VICTORIA PARK TO BE LEFT AS CITY GREEN SPACE. HIGHRISE IN THE CITY TO INCREASE POPULATION, VITALITY i AGREE WITH TRAM EXTENSIONS & plans I AGREE WITH RECYCLED WATER I AGREE WITH HERITAGE BUILDINGS SHOULD DEFINITELY CONTINUE TO BE PROTECTED, I DO NOT AGREE WITH DEMOISHING THESE BUILDINGS WITH THE EXCUSE THAT HIGH RISE BUILDIGS WILL INCREASE THE VITALITY & POPULATION OF CBD ADELAIDE. A BALANCE SHOULD ALLOW FOR HERITAGE BUILDINGS TO REMAIN, BE APPRECIATED, YET MADE USEFULL. USE SHOULD BE MADE OF ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS, SO THAT WE CAN COMBINE RETAINING THESE BUILDINGS YET BRING IN THE LIFESTYLE POSITIVES & IDENTITY THAT EXISTS IN ADELAIDE. CHANGES ARE REQUIRED THAT GIVE ENERGY TO THE CITY, SHOPS, USE OF ALLEYS ETC AND THESE SPACES YET MAINTAIN THE OLD AUSTRALIAN CHARM THAT PERVADES THE CITY. PLANNERS SHOULD BE CAREFUL TO CONCENTRATE ON THESE ASPECTS TO MAINTAIN THE CHARACTER OF THE CITY IN THE WAY THAT FITS THE AGE WE ARE IN, YET PRESERVES THE BUILDINGS, PARKLANDS & OPEN SPACES THAT COLONEL LIGHT ENVISAGED FOR THE GERNERATIONS TO COME.

    Posted Tuesday, 27 October 2009 6:11 PM

  • Paul Hamon said...

    The work BICYCLE is only mentioned once in the whole document... hardly a decent future!

    Posted Tuesday, 27 October 2009 6:49 PM

  • Mat said...

    I think the document is fairly good. Highrise is definately needed in the CBD though. Not only will it increase our population, but it will increase the popularity and outlook of our skyline

    Posted Tuesday, 3 November 2009 5:28 PM

Post Comment
* = Required Information

Subscribe